Methods for use of genetically modified tumor-targeted bacteria with reduced virulence

ABSTRACT

The present invention is directed to mutant Salmonella sp. having a genetically modified msbB gene in which the mutant Salmonella is capable of targeting solid tumors. The present invention further relates to the therapeutic use of the mutant Salmonella for growth inhibition and/or reduction in volume of solid tumors.

1. FIELD OF THE INVENTION

[0001] The present invention is concerned with the isolation of a gene of Salmonella which, when genetically disrupted, reduces both virulence and septic shock caused by this organism and increases sensitivity to agents which promote eradication of the bacteria, e.g., chelating agents. The nucleotide sequence of this gene and the means for its genetic disruption are provided, and examples of the use of tumor-targeted bacteria which possess a disruption in this gene to inhibit growth of cancers, including, but not limited to, melanoma, colon cancer, and other solid tumors are described.

2. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0002] Citation or identification of any reference in Section 2 of this application shall not be construed as an admission that such reference is available as prior art to the present invention.

[0003] A major problem in the chemotherapy of solid tumor cancers is delivery of therapeutic agents, such as drugs, in sufficient concentrations to eradicate tumor cells while at the same time minimizing damage to normal cells. Thus, studies in many laboratories are directed toward the design of biological delivery systems, such as antibodies, cytokines, and viruses for targeted delivery of drugs, pro-drug converting enzymes, and/or genes into tumor cells. Houghton and Colt, 1993, New Perspectives in Cancer Diagnosis and Management 1: 65-70; de Palazzo, et al., 1992a, Cell. Immunol. 142:338-347; de Palazzo et al., 1992b, Cancer Res. 52: 5713-5719; Weiner, et al., 1993a, J. Immunotherapy 13:110-116; Weiner et al., 1993b, J. Immunol. 151:2877-2886; Adams et al., 1993, Cancer Res. 53:4026-4034; Fanger et al., 1990, FASEB J. 4:2846-2849; Fanger et al., 1991, Immunol. Today 12:51-54; Segal, et al., 1991, Ann N.Y. Acad. Sci. 636:288-294; Segal et al., 1992, Immunobiology 185:390-402; Wunderlich et al., 1992; Intl. J. Clin. Lab. Res. 22:17-20; George et al., 1994, J. Immunol. 152:1802-1811; Huston et al., 1993, Intl. Rev. Immunol. 10:195-217; Stafford et al., 1993, Cancer Res. 53:4026-4034; Haber et al., 1992, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 667:365-381; Haber, 1992, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 667: 365-381; Feloner and Rhodes, 1991, Nature 349:351-352; Sarver and Rossi, 1993, AIDS Research & Human Retroviruses 9:483-487; Levine and Friedmann, 1993, Am. J. Dis. Child 147:1167-1176; Friedmann, 1993, Mol. Genetic Med. 3:1-32; Gilboa and Smith, 1994, Trends in Genetics 10:139-144; Saito et al., 1994, Cancer Res. 54:3516-3520; Li et al., 1994, Blood 83:3403-3408; Vieweg et al., 1994, Cancer Res. 54:1760-1765; Lin et al., 1994, Science 265:666-669; Lu et al., 1994, Human Gene Therapy 5:203-208; Gansbacher et al., 1992, Blood 80:2817-2825; Gastl et al., 1992, Cancer Res. 52:6229-6236.

2.1. Bacterial Infections and Cancer

[0004] Regarding bacteria and cancer, an historical review reveals a number of clinical observations in which cancers were reported to regress in patients with bacterial infections. Nauts et al., 1953, Acta Medica. Scandinavica 145:1-102, (Suppl. 276) state:

[0005] The treatment of cancer by injections of bacterial products is based on the fact that for over two hundred years neoplasms have been observed to regress following acute infections, principally streptococcal. If these cases were not too far advanced and the infections were of sufficient severity or duration, the tumors completely disappeared and the patients remained free from recurrence.

[0006] Shear, 1950, J. A.M.A. 142:383-390 (Shear), observed that 75 percent of the spontaneous remissions in untreated leukemia in the Children's Hospital in Boston occurred following an acute episode of bacterial infection. Shear questioned:

[0007] Are pathogenic and non-pathogenic organisms one of Nature's controls of microscopic foci of malignant disease, and in making progress in the control of infectious diseases, are we removing one of Nature's controls of cancer?

[0008] Subsequent evidence from a number of research laboratories indicated that at least some of the anti-cancer effects are mediated through stimulation of the host immune system, resulting in enhanced immuno-rejection of the cancer cells. For example, release of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) endotoxin by gram-negative bacteria such as Salmonella triggers release of tumor necrosis factor, TNF, by cells of the host immune system, such as macrophages, Christ et al., 1995, Science 268:80-83. Elevated TNF levels in turn initiate a cascade of cytokine-mediated reactions which culminate in the death of tumor cells. In this regard, Carswell et al., 1975, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72:3666-3669, demonstrated that mice injected with bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) have increased serum levels of TNF and that TNF-positive serum caused necrosis of the sarcoma Meth A and other transplanted tumors in mice. Further, Klimpel et al., 1990, J. Immunol. 145:711-717, showed that fibroblasts infected in vitro with Shigella or Salmonella had increased susceptibility to TNF.

[0009] As a result of such observations as described above, immunization of cancer patients with BCG injections is currently utilized in some cancer therapy protocols. See Sosnowski, 1994, Compr. Ther. 20:695-701; Barth and Morton, 1995, Cancer 75 (Suppl. 2):726-734; Friberg, 1993, Med. Oncol. Tumor. Pharmacother. 10:31-36 for reviews of BCG therapy.

2.2. Parasites and Cancer Cells

[0010] Although the natural biospecificity and evolutionary adaptability of parasites has been recognized for some time and the use of their specialized systems as models for new therapeutic procedures has been suggested, there are few reports of, or proposals for, the actual use of parasites as vectors.

[0011] Lee et al., 1992, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:1847-1851 (Lee et al.) and Jones et al., 1992, Infect. Immun. 60:2475-2480 (Jones et al.) isolated mutants of Salmonella typhimurium that were able to invade HEp-2 (human epidermoid carcinoma) cells in vitro in significantly greater numbers than the wild type strain. The “hyperinvasive” mutants were isolated under conditions of aerobic growth of the bacteria that normally repress the ability of wild type strains to invade HEp-2 animal cells. However, Lee et al. and Jones et al. did not suggest the use of such mutants as therapeutic vectors, nor did they suggest the isolation of tumor-specific bacteria by selecting for mutants that show infection preference for melanoma or other cancers over normal cells of the body. Without tumor-specificity or other forms of attenuation, such hyperinvasive Salmonella typhimurium as described by Lee et al. and Jones et al. would likely be pan-invasive, causing wide-spread infection in the cancer patient.

2.3. Tumor-Targeted Bacteria

[0012] Genetically engineered Salmonella have been demonstrated to be capable of tumor targeting, possess anti-tumor activity and are useful in delivering effector genes such as the herpes simplex thymidine kinase (HSV TK) to solid tumors (Pawelek et al., WO 96/40238). Two significant considerations for the in vivo use of bacteria are their virulence and ability to induce tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα)-mediated septic shock. As TNFα-mediated septic shock is among the primary concerns associated with bacteria, modifications which reduce this form of an immune response would be useful because TNFα levels would not become toxic, and a more effective concentration and/or duration of the therapeutic vector could be used.

2.4. Modified Bacterial Lipid A

[0013] Modifications to the lipid composition of tumor-targeted bacteria which alter the immune response as a result of decreased induction of TNFα production were suggested by Pawelek et al. (Pawelek et al., WO 96/40238). Pawelek et al. provided methods for isolation of genes from Rhodobacter responsible for monophosphoryl lipid A (MLA) production. MLA acts as an antagonist to septic shock. Pawelek et al. also suggested the use of genetic modifications in the lipid A biosynthetic pathway, including the mutation firA, which codes for the third enzyme UDP-3-0 (R-30 hydroxylmyristoly)glucosamine N-acyltransferase in lipid A biosynthesis (Kelley et al., 1993, J. Biol. Chem. 268: 19866-19874). Pawelek et al. showed that mutations in the firA gene induce lower levels of TNFα. However, these authors did not suggest enzymes which modify the myristate portion of the lipid A molecule. Furthermore, Pawelek et al. did not suggest that modifications to the lipid content of bacteria would alter their sensitivity to certain agents, such as chelating agents.

[0014] In Escherichia coli, the gene msbB (mlt) which is responsible for the terminal myristalization of lipid A has been identified (Engel, et al., 1992 J. Bacteriol. 174:6394-6403; Karow and Georgopoulos 1992 J. Bacteriol. 174: 702-710; Somerville et al., 1996 J. Clin. Invest. 97: 359-365). Genetic disruption of this gene results in a stable non-conditional mutation which lowers TNFα induction (Somerville et al., 1996 J. Clin. Invest. 97: 359-365). These references, however, do not suggest that disruption of the msbB gene in tumor-targeted Salmonella vectors would result in bacteria which are less virulent and more sensitive to chelating agents. The problems associated with the use of bacteria as gene delivery vectors center on the general ability of bacteria to directly kill normal mammalian cells as well as their ability to overstimulate the immune system via TNFα which can have toxic consequences for the host (Bone, 1992 JAMA 268: 3452-3455; Dinarello et al., 1993 JAMA 269: 1829-1835). In addition to these factors, resistance to antibiotics can severely complicate coping with the presence of bacteria within the human body (Tschape, 1996 D T W Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr 1996 103:273-7; Ramos et al., 1996 Enferm Infec. Microbiol. Clin. 14: 345-51).

[0015] Hone and Powell, WO97/18837 (“Hone and Powell”), disclose methods to produce gram-negative bacteria having non-pyrogenic Lipid A or LPS. Although Hone and Powell broadly asserts that conditional mutations in a large number of genes including msbB, kdsA, kdsB, kdtA, and htrB, etc. can be introduced into a broad variety of gram-negative bacteria including E. coli, Shigella sp., Salmonella sp., etc., the only mutation exemplified is an htrB mutation introduced into E. coli. Further, although Hone and Powell propose the therapeutic use of non-pyrogenic Salmonella with a mutation in the msbB gene, there is no enabling description of how to accomplish such use. Moreover, Hone and Powell propose using non-pyrogenic bacteria only for vaccine purposes.

[0016] The objective of a vaccine vector is significantly different from the presently claimed tumor-targeted vectors. Thus, vaccine vectors have requirements quite different from tumor-targeted vectors. Vaccine vectors are intended to elicit an immune response. A preferred live bacterial vaccine must be immunogenic so that it elicits protective immunity; however, the vaccine must not be capable of excessive growth in vivo which might result in adverse reactions. According to the teachings of Hone and Powell, a suitable bacterial vaccine vector is temperature sensitive having minimal replicative ability at normal physiological ranges of body temperature.

[0017] In contrast, preferred tumor-targeted parasitic vectors, such as but not limited to Salmonella, are safely tolerated by the normal tissues of the body such that pathogenesis is limited, yet the vectors target to tumors and freely replicate within them. Thus, vaccine vectors which replicate minimally at normal body temperatures, would not be suitable for use as tumor-targeted vectors.

3. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0018] The present invention provides a means to enhance the safety of tumor-targeted bacteria, for example, by genetic modification of the lipid A molecule. The modified tumor-targeted bacteria of the present invention induce TNFα less than the wild type bacteria and have reduced ability to directly kill normal mammalian cells or cause systemic disease compared to the wild type strain. The modified tumor-targeted bacteria of the present invention have increased therapeutic efficacy, i.e., more effective dosages of bacteria can be used and for extended time periods due to the lower toxicity in the form of less induced TNFα and systemic disease.

[0019] The present invention provides compositions and methods for the genetic disruption of the msbB gene in bacteria, such as Salmonella, which results in bacteria, such as Salmonella, possessing a lesser ability to elicit TNFα and reduced virulence compared to the wild type. Additionally, the genetically modified bacteria have increased sensitivity to a chelating agent compared to bacteria with the wild type msbB gene. In a preferred embodiment, Salmonella, which are hyperinvasive to tumor tissues, are able to replicate within the tumors, and are useful for inhibiting the growth and/or reducing the tumor volume of sarcomas, carcinomas, lymphomas or other solid tumor cancers, such as germ line tumors and tumors of the central nervous system, including, but not limited to, breast cancer, prostate cancer, cervical cancer, uterine cancer, lung cancer., ovarian cancer, testicular cancer, thyroid cancer, astrocytoma, glioma, pancreatic cancer, stomach cancer, liver cancer, colon cancer, and melanoma.

[0020] In an embodiment of the present invention, the bacteria are attenuated by other means, including but not limited to auxotrophic mutations. In another embodiment, the bacteria express pro-drug converting enzymes including but not limited to HSV-TK, cytosine deaminase (CD), and p450 oxidoreductase.

[0021] The present invention also provides a means for enhanced sensitivity for use in terminating therapy and for post therapy elimination. According to one embodiment of the present invention, the tumor-targeted bacteria having a genetically modified lipid A also have enhanced susceptibility to certain agents, e.g., chelating agents. It is a further advantage to modify tumor-targeted bacteria in this way because it increases the ability to eliminate the bacteria with agents which have an antibiotic-like effect, such as chelating agents including, but not limited to, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA), Ethylene Glycol-bis(β-aminoethyl Ether) N, N, N′, N′,-Tetraacetic Acid (EGTA), and sodium citrate. Modification to enhance the ability to eliminate the bacteria via exogenous means, such as the administration of an agent to which the genetically modified bacteria are more sensitive than their wild type counterparts, is therefore useful.

4. DEFINITIONS

[0022] As used herein, Salmonella encompasses all Salmonella species, including: Salmonella typhi, Salmonella choleraesuis, and Salmonella enteritidis. Serotypes of Salmonella are also encompassed herein, for example, typhimurium, a subgroup of Salmonella enteritidis, commonly referred to as Salmonella typhimurium.

[0023] Attenuation: Attenuation is a modification so that a microorganism or vector is less pathogenic. The end result of attenuation is that the risk of toxicity as well as other side-effects is decreased, when the microorganism or vector is administered to the patient.

[0024] Virulence: Virulence is a relative term describing the general ability to cause disease, including the ability to kill normal cells or the ability to elicit septic shock (see specific definition below).

[0025] Septic shock: Septic shock is a state of internal organ failure due to a complex cytokine cascade, initiated by TNFα. The relative ability of a microorganism or vector to elicit TNFα is used as one measure to indicate its relative ability to induce septic shock.

[0026] Chelating agent sensitivity: Chelating agent sensitivity is defined as the effective concentration at which bacteria proliferation is affected, or the concentration at which the viability of bacteria, as determined by recoverable colony forming units (c.f.u.), is reduced.

5. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

[0027] The present invention may be understood more fully by reference to the following detailed description, illustrative examples of specific embodiments and the appended figures.

[0028]FIG. 1. The complete DNA sequence of the Salmonella wild-type (WT) 14028 msbB gene (SEQ ID NO:1) and the deduced amino acid sequence of the encoded protein (SEQ ID NO:2).

[0029]FIG. 2A-2C. Knockout construct generated using the cloned Salmonella WT 14028 msbB gene. The cloned gene was cut with SphI and MluI thereby removing approximately half of the msbB coding sequence, and the tetracycline resistance gene (TET) from pBR322 cut with AatII and AvaI was inserted after blunt-ending using the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I. A=Knockout construct. B=Salmonella chromosomal copy of msbB. C=Salmonella disrupted chromosomal copy of msbB after homologous recombination. The start codon (ATG) and stop codon (TAA) and restriction sites AseI, BamHI, SphI, MluI, and EcoRV are shown. The position of two primers, P1 and P2 which generate two different sized PCR products for either wild type or disrupted msbB are shown.

[0030]FIG. 3A-3C. Southern blot analysis of chromosomally disrupted Salmonella WT 14028 msbB. A) Southern blot probed with the tetracycline gene, demonstrating its presence in the plasmid construct and the two clones, and its absence in the WT 14028 bacteria. B) Southern blot of a similar gel probed with an ³²P-labeled AseI/BamH1 fragment derived from the cloned msbB. The AseI enzyme cuts upstream of msbB, and the BamHl cuts in one location in the wild type, but in a second location in the tetracycline gene which results in a higher molecular weight product. Lane 1 (KO) shows the position of the band in the knockout construct, compared to the WT 14028 in lane 2 (WT). Lanes 3 and 4 show the clones YS8211 and YS861 with a higher molecular weight product. C) Southern blot of a similar gel probed with an ³²P-labeled mluI fragment derived from the cloned msbB. See text Section 7.2 for details.

[0031]FIG. 4. TNFα induction by live Salmonella WT 14028 in mice. 1×10⁸ live bacteria in 0.1 cc phosphate buffered saline of the wild type or msbB- disrupted strains were injected i.v. in the tail vein of Balb/c mice. The bar graph indicates the TNFα induction with error bars. Clone YS8211 induces TNFα 32% compared to Salmonella WT 14028.

[0032]FIG. 5. TNFα response by Sinclair swine to live Salmonella WT 14028 and msbB⁻ clone YS8212. TNFα levels were measured at 1.5 and 6.0 hours following i.v. introduction of 1×109 c.f.u. Salmonella WT 14028 and YS8212. At 1.5 hours TNFα response was significantly lower (p≦0.011) in the msbB deletion mutant compared to the wild type.

[0033]FIG. 6. Respiratory level changes induced by LPS from WT 14028 and msbB⁻ clone YS8212. Sinclair swine were injected with 5 or 500 μg/kg purified LPS and respiration rate was determined. The 500 Ag/kg of LPS from Salmonella WT 14028 raised the rate of respiration to more than 4 times normal, whereas the rate of respiration in msbB⁻ LPS-treated animals was less than doubled.

[0034]FIG. 7. TNFα induction by live Salmonella WT 14028 in human monocytes. Human monocytes isolated from peripheral blood were exposed to increasing amounts of Salmonella c.f.u. At 1.0×10⁵ c.f.u., concentrations of TNFα induced by WT 14028 were more than 3 times higher than those induced by a number of msbB⁻ clones, i.e., YS8211, YS8212, YS8658, and YS1170.

[0035]FIG. 8. TNFα production by human monocytes. Human monocytes isolated from peripheral blood were exposed to increasing amounts of purified LPS. As little as 1 nanogram of LPS from wild type was sufficient to elicit a measurable TNFα response and was maximal at 10 ng. In contrast, 100 μg of LPS from each of a number of msbB⁻ clones was insufficient to generate any response. Thus, at 10 ng LPS, the concentration of TNFα induced by Salmonella WT 14028 was at least 10 times higher than concentrations of TNFα induced by the independent msbB knockouts, i.e., YS7216 and YS8211, and the derivatives, i.e., YS1170, YS8644, YS1604, YS8212, YS8658, YS1601, YS1629.

[0036]FIG. 9A-9B. Survival of mice and Sinclair swine, injected with 2×10⁷ or 1×10⁹ respectively of live bacteria. A) WT 14028 killed all the mice in 4 days, whereas the msbB⁻ clone YS862 spared 90% of the mice past 20 days. B) Similarly, WT 14028 killed all the swine in 3 days, whereas the msbB⁻ clone YS8212 spared 100% of the swine past 20 days.

[0037]FIG. 10. Biodistribution of msbB⁻ Salmonella YS8211 in B16F10 melanoma tumors. At 5 days, the ratio of msbB⁻ Salmonella within the tumors compared to those in the liver exceeded 1000:1.

[0038]FIG. 11. Tumor retardation by msbB⁻ Salmonella. B16F10 melanoma tumors were implanted in the flank of C57BL/6 mice and allowed to progress to day 8. Mice either received no bacteria (control) or msbB⁻ strains YS8211, YS8212, YS7216, YS1629. Two of the strains, YS8211 and YS1629 retarded tumor progression significantly, whereas strains YS7216 and YS8212 did not.

[0039]FIG. 12A-12C. Sensitivity of WT 14028 and msbB disrupted bacteria to chelating agents. Wild type and msbB disrupted Salmonella clone YS8211 and YS862 were grown in LB broth lacking sodium chloride (LB-zero), in the presence or absence of 1 mM EDTA (FIG. 12A) or in the presence or absence of 10 mM sodium citrate (FIG. 12B). The OD₆₀₀ was determined and plotted as a function of time. The msbB+ strain showed little inhibition by EDTA or sodium citrate, compared to the msbB⁻ strains which showed near complete cessation of growth after 3 hours for EDTA or sodium citrate.

[0040]FIG. 13A-13B. Survival of msbB⁻ bacteria within murine macrophages. Murine bone marrow-derived macrophages (FIG. 13A) and a murine macrophage cell line, J774, (FIG. 13B) were used as hosts for bacterial internalization and quantified over time. The data are presented as a percentage of initial c.f.u.

6. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0041] The present invention is based on the isolation of a gene of Salmonella, i.e., msbB, which, when present in its normal form, contributes to TNFα induction, general virulence, survival within macrophages, and insensitivity to certain agents which promote eradication of the bacteria. The present invention is directed to the genetic modification of the gene which results in disrupting the normal function of the product of the gene, and the incorporation of the genetic modification into tumor-targeted bacteria, including Salmonella, for therapeutic use. In a preferred embodiment, the genetically modified bacteria are used in animals, including humans, for reduction of volume and/or growth inhibition of solid tumors.

[0042] In a preferred embodiment, bacteria useful for the present invention show preference for attachment to and penetration into certain solid tumor cancer cells or have an enhanced propensity to proliferate in tumor tissues as compared to normal tissues. These bacteria, including but not limited to Salmonella, having a natural ability to distinguish between cancerous or neoplastic cells tissues and normal cells/tissues.

[0043] Alternatively, tumor cell-specific bacteria useful for the invention may be selected for and/or improved in tumor targeting ability using the methods described by Pawelek et al., WO 96/40238 incorporated herein by reference. Pawelek et al. describe methods for isolating tumor cell-specific bacteria by cycling a microorganism through a pre-selected target cell, preferably a solid tumor cell in vitro, or through a solid tumor in vivo, using one or more cycles of infection.

6.1. Isolation/Identification of a Gene Involved in Virulence

[0044] The E. coli gene, msbB, has been shown to be involved in myristilization of lipid A (Somerville et al., 1996, J. Clin. Invest. 97:359-365.) The chromosomal organization of the E. coli msbB gene and the DNA sequence coding for the msbB gene have been described (Engel, et al., 1992, J. Bacteriol. 174:6394-6403; Karow and Georgopoulos, 1992., J. Bacteriol. 174: 702-710; Somerville et al., 1996, J. Clin. Invest. 97: 359-365). However, this gene or a homologue has not been isolated from other species of bacteria.

[0045] As shown in the present invention, the msbB gene can be isolated from bacterial strains, other than E. coli, using low stringency DNA/DNA hybridization techniques known to those skilled in the art. (Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1989). For an illustrative example of isolation of a msbB gene of bacteria, including but not limited to Salmonella spp., see Section 7.1 infra. A bacterial DNA library can be probed with a ³²P-labeled msbB gene from E. coli. Hybridizing clones are determined to be correct if they contain DNA sequences similar to the known E. coli msbB gene.

6.1.1. Genetic Alteration of Salmonella msbB

[0046] One embodiment of the present invention provides a composition of matter which is a strain of bacteria with a genetic alteration in the msbB gene. In a preferred embodiment, the bacteria is Salmonella sp. Genetic alteration in the form of disruption or deletion can be accomplished by several means known to those skilled in the art, including homologous recombination using an antibiotic sensitivity marker. These methods involve disruption of the plasmid-based, cloned msbB gene using restriction endonucleases such that part or all of the gene is disrupted or eliminated or such that the normal transcription and translation are interrupted, and an antibiotic resistance marker for phenotypic selection is inserted in the region of that deletion, disruption or other alteration. Linearized DNA is transformed into Salmonella, and bacteria bearing the antibiotic resistance are further examined for evidence of genetic alteration. Means for examining genetic alteration include PCR analysis and Southern blotting. For an illustrative example of genetic disruption of a Salmonella msbB gene, see Section 7.2.

[0047] In another embodiment of the invention, the msbB-/antibiotic sensitivity marker can be transduced into a new bacterial strain. An illustrative example is provided in Section 7.2. Bacteriophage P22 and a Salmonella msbB⁻ clone can be grown in zero salt Luria broth and the new phages in the supernate can be used to infect a new Salmonella strain.

[0048] Yet another embodiment of the present invention provides Salmonella that are attenuated in more than one manner, e.g., a mutation in the pathway for lipid A production, such as the msbB mutation described herein and one or more mutations to auxotrophy for one or more nutrients or metabolites, such as uracil biosynthesis, purine biosynthesis, and arginine biosynthesis as described by Bochner, 1980, J. Bacteriol. 143:926-933 herein incorporated by reference. In a preferred embodiment, the ability of msbB⁻ Salmonella to accumulate within tumors is retained by msbB-Salmonella having one or more auxotrophic mutations. In a more preferred mode of this embodiment of the invention, the bacterial vector which selectively targets tumors and expresses a pro-drug converting enzyme is auxotrophic for uracil, aromatic amino acids, isoleucine and valine and synthesizes an altered lipid A.

6.1.2. Characteristics of Salmonella Having Disrupted msbB Recuction of TNFα Induction

[0049] A characteristic of the msbB⁻ Salmonella, described herein, is decreased ability to induce a TNFα response compared to the wild type bacterial vector. Both the whole bacteria and isolated or purified lipopolysaccharide (LPS) elicit a TNFα response. In an embodiment of the invention, the msbB⁻ Salmonella induces TNFA expression at about 5 percent to about 40 percent compared to the wild type Salmonella sp. (in other words, the msbB⁻ Salmonella induces TNFα expression at about 5 percent to about 40 percent of the level induced by wild type Salmonella, e.g., WT 14028.) In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the msbB⁻ Salmonella induces TNFα expression at about 10 percent to about 35 percent of that induced by a wild type Salmonella sp. In an embodiment of the invention, purified LPS from msbB⁻ Salmonella induces TNFα expression at a level which is less than or equal to 0.001 percent of the level induced by LPS purified from wild type Salmonella sp. TNFα response induced by whole bacteria or isolated or purified LPS can be assessed in vitro or in vivo using commercially available assay systems such as by enzyme linked immunoassay (ELISA). For illustrative examples, see sections 7.3.1 and 7.3.2 infra. Comparison of TNFα production on a per c.f.u. or on a μg/kg basis, is used to determine relative activity. Lower TNFα levels on a per unit basis indicate decreased induction of TNFα production.

REDUCTION OF VIRULENCE

[0050] Another characteristic of the msbB⁻ Salmonella, described herein, is decreased virulence towards the host cancer patient compared to the wild type bacterial vector. Wild type Salmonella can under some circumstances exhibit the ability to cause significant progressive disease. Acute lethality can be determined for normal wild type live Salmonella and live msbB⁻ Salmonella using animal models. For an illustrative example, see Section 7.4 and Section 9, Table III. Comparison of animal survival for a fixed inoculum is used to determine relative virulence. Strains having a higher rate of survival have decreased virulence.

DECREASED SURVIVAL WITHIN MACROPHAGES

[0051] Another characteristic of msbB⁻ Salmonella described herein, is decreased survival within macrophage cells as compared to survival of wild type bacteria. Wild type Salmonella (e.g., ATCC 14028) are noted for their ability to survive within macrophages (Baumler, et al., 1994, Infect. Immun. 62:1623-1630; Buchmeier and Heffron 1989, Infect. Immun. 57:1-7; Buchmeier and Heffron, 1990, Science 248:730-732; Buchmeier et al., 1993, Mol. Microbiol. 7:933-936; Fields et al., 1986, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:5189-93; Fields et al., 1989, Science 243:1059-62; Fierer et al., 1993, Infect. Immun. 61:5231-5236; Lindgren et al., 1996, Proc. Natal. Acad. Sci. USA 3197-4201; Miller et al., 1989, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:5054-5058; Sizemore et al., 1997, Infect. Immun. 65:309-312).

[0052] A comparison of survival time in macrophages can be made using an in vitro cell culture assay. A lower number of c.f.u. over time is indicative of reduced survival within macrophages. For an illustrative example, see Section 8 infra. As shown therein, using the gentamicin-based internalization assay and bone marrow-derived murine macrophages or the murine macrophage cell line J774, a comparison of survival of WT 14028 and msbB⁻ clone YS8211 was determined. In an embodiment of the invention, survival occurs at about 50 percent to about 30 percent; preferably at about 30 percent to about 10 percent; more preferably at about 10 percent to about 1 percent of survival of the wild type stain.

INCREASED SENSITIVITY

[0053] Another characteristic of one embodiment of the msbB⁻ Salmonella, described herein, is increased sensitivity, of the tumor-targeted bacteria to specific chemical agents which is advantageously useful to assist in the elimination of the bacteria after administration in vivo. Bacteria are susceptible to a wide range of antibiotic classes. However, it has surprisingly been discovered that certain Salmonella msbB⁻ mutants encompassed by the present invention are sensitive to certain chemicals which are not normally considered antibacterial agents. In particular, certain msbB⁻ Salmonella mutants are more sensitive than WT 14028 to chelating agents.

[0054] Previous descriptions of msbB⁻ E. coli have not suggested increased sensitivity to such chelating agents. To the contrary, reports have included increased resistance to detergents such as deoxycholate (Karow and Georgopoulos 1992 J. Bacteriol. 174: 702-710).

[0055] To determine sensitivity to chemical agents, normal wild type bacteria and msbB⁻ bacteria are compared for growth in the presence or absence of a chelating agent, for example, EDTA, EGTA or sodium citrate. Comparison of growth is measured as a function of optical density, i.e., a lower optical density in the msbB⁺ strain grown in the presence of an agent, than when the strain is grown in its absence, indicates sensitivity. Furthermore, a lower optical density in the msbB⁻ strain grown in the presence of an agent, compared to the msbB⁺ strain grown in its presence, indicates sensitivity specifically due to the msbB mutation. For an illustrative example, see section 7.7 infra. In an embodiment of the invention, 90 percent inhibition of growth of msbB-Salmonella (compared to growth of wild type Salmonella sp.) occurs at about 0.25 mM EDTA to about 0.5 mM EDTA, preferably at about 99 percent inhibition at about 0.25 mM EDTA to above 0.5 mM EDTA, more preferably at greater than 99 percent inhibition at about 0.25 mM EDTA to about 0.5 mM EDTA. Similar range of growth inhibition is observed at similar concentrations of EDTA.

DERIVATIVES OF msbB MUTANTS

[0056] When grown in Luria Broth (LB) containing zero salt, the msbB⁻ mutants of the present invention are stable, i.e., produce few derivatives (as defined below). Continued growth of the msbB⁻ mutants on modified LB (10 g tryptone, 5 g yeast extract, 2 ml 1N CaCl₂, and 2 ml 1N MgSO₄ per liter, adjusted to pH 7 using 1N NaOH) also maintains stable mutants. In contrast, when grown in normal LB, the msbB⁻ mutants may give rise to derivatives. As used herein, “derivatives” is intended to mean spontaneous variants of the msbB⁻ mutants characterized by a different level of virulence, tumor inhibitory activity and/or sensitivity to a chelating agent when compared to the original msbB mutant. The level of virulence, tumor inhibitory activity, and sensitivity to a chelating agent of a derivative may be greater, equivalent, or less compared to the original msbB⁻ mutant.

[0057] Derivatives of msbB⁻ strains grow faster on unmodified LB than the original msbB⁻ strains. In addition, derivatives can be recognized by their ability to grow on MacConkey agar (an agar which contains bile salts) and by their resistance to chelating agents, such as EGTA and EDTA. Derivatives can be stably preserved by cryopreservation at −70° C. or lyophilization according to methods well known in the art (Cryz et al., 1990, In New Generation Vaccines, M. M. Levine (ed.), Marcel Dekker, New York pp. 921-932; Adams, 1996, In Methods in Molecular Medicine: Vaccine Protocols, Robinson et al. (eds), Humana Press, New Jersey, pp. 167-185; Griffiths, Id. pp. 269-288.)

[0058] Virulence is determined by evaluation of the administered dose at which half of the animals die (LD₅₀). Comparison of the LD₅₀ of the derivatives can be used to assess the comparative virulence. Decrease in the LD₅₀ of a spontaneous derivative as compared to its msbB⁻ parent, indicates an increase in virulence. In an illustrative example, the faster-growing derivatives either exhibit the same level of virulence, a greater level of virulence, or a lower level of virulence compared to their respective original mutant strains (see Section 9, Table III.) In another example, the ability of a derivative to induce TNFα remains the same as the original mutant strain (see Section 7.3, FIG. 7).

[0059] In an illustrative example, the derivatives can either inhibit tumor growth more than or less than their respective original mutant strains (see Section 7.6, FIG. 11). It is demonstrated in Section 7.6 that the original msbB⁻ mutant, YS8211, significantly inhibits tumor growth whereas a derivative of this clone, YS8212, has less tumor growth inhibition activity. In contrast, the derivative, YS1629, exhibits enhanced tumor growth inhibition activity compared to its parent msbB clone, YS7216.

[0060] A derivative which is more virulent than its parent mutant but which does induce TNF⁻ at a lower level when compared to the wild type, i.e., at a level of about 5 percent to about 40 percent of that induced by the wild type Salmonella, can be further modified to contain one or more mutations to auxotrophy. In an illustrative example, the YS1170 derivative is mutated such that it is auxotrophic for one or more aromatic amino acids, e.g., aroA, and thus can be made less virulent and is useful according to the methods of the present invention.

[0061] Prior to use of a derivative in the methods of the invention, the derivative is assessed to determine its level of virulence, ability to induce TNFα, ability to inhibit tumor growth, and sensitivity to a chelating agent.

6.2. USE OF SALMONELLA WITH DISRUPTED msbB FOR TUMOR TARGETING AND IN VIVO TREATMENT OF SOLID TUMORS

[0062] According to the present invention, the msbB⁻ mutant Salmonella are advantageously used in methods to produce a tumor growth inhibitory response or a reduction of tumor volume in an animal including a human patient having a solid tumor cancer. For such applications, it is advantageous that the msbB⁻ mutant Salmonella possess tumor targeting ability or target preferably to tumor cells/tissues rather than normal cells/tissues. Additionally, it is advantageous that the msbB⁻ mutant Salmonella possess the ability to retard or reduce tumor growth and/or deliver a gene or gene product that retards or reduces tumor growth. Tumor targeting ability can be assessed by a variety of methods known to those skilled in the art, including but not limited to cancer animal models.

[0063] For example, Salmonella with a msbB⁻ modification are assayed to determine if they possess tumor targeting ability using the B16F10 melanoma subcutaneous animal model. A positive ratio of tumor to liver indicates that the genetically modified Salmonella possesses tumor targeting ability. For an illustrative example, see Section 7.5.

[0064] Salmonella with the msbB⁻ modification can be assayed to determine if they possess anti-tumor ability using any of a number of standard in vivo models, for example, the B16F10 melanoma subcutaneous animal model. By way of an illustrative example, and not by way of limitation, tumors are implanted in the flanks of mice and staged to day 8 and then bacterial strains are injected i.p. Tumor volume is monitored over time. Anti-tumor activity is determined to be present if tumors are smaller in the bacteria-containing groups than in the untreated tumor-containing animals. For an illustrative example, see section 7.6 infra.

[0065] The Salmonella of the present invention for in vivo treatment are genetically modified such that, when administered to a host, the bacteria is less toxic to the host and easier to eradicate from the host's system. The Salmonella are super-infective, attenuated and specific for a target tumor cell. In a more preferred embodiment, the Salmonella may be sensitive to chelating agents having antibiotic-like activity.

[0066] In addition, the Salmonella used in the methods of the invention can encode “suicide genes”, such as pro-drug converting enzymes or other genes, which are expressed and secreted by the Salmonella in or near the target tumor. Table 2 of Pawelek et al. WO96/40238 at pages 34-35 presents an illustrative list of pro-drug converting enzymes which are usefully secreted or expressed by msbB⁻ mutant Salmonella for use in the methods of the invention. Table 2 and pages 32-35 are incorporated herein by reference. The gene can be under the control of either constitutive, inducible or cell-type specific promoters. See Pawelek et al. at pages 35-43, incorporated herein by reference, for additional promoters, etc. useful for mutant Salmonella for the methods of the present invention. In a preferred embodiment, a suicide gene is expressed and secreted only when a Salmonella has invaded the cytoplasm of the target tumor cell, thereby limiting the effects due to expression of the suicide gene to the target site of the tumor.

[0067] In a preferred embodiment, the Salmonella, administered to the host, expresses the HSV TK gene. Upon concurrent expression of the TK gene and administration of ganciclovir to the host, the ganciclovir is phosphorylated in the periplasm of the microorganism which is freely permeable to nucleotide triphosphates. The phosphorylated ganciclovir, a toxic false DNA precursor, readily passes out of the periplasm of the microorganism and into the cytoplasm and nucleus of the host cell where it incorporates into host cell DNA, thereby causing the death of the host cell.

[0068] The method of the invention for inhibiting growth or reducing volume of a solid tumor comprises administering to a patient having a solid tumor, an effective amount of an isolated mutant Salmonella sp. comprising a genetically modified msbB gene, said mutant being capable of targeting to the solid tumor when administered in vivo. The msbB⁻ mutant Salmonella may also express a suicide gene as described above.

[0069] In addition, in one embodiment the isolated Salmonella is analyzed for sensitivity to chelating agents to insure for ease in eradication of the Salmonella from the patient's body after successful treatment or if the patient experiences complications due to the administration of the isolated Salmonella. Thus, if Salmonella is employed which is sensitive to a chelating agent, at about 0.25 mM to about 1.0 mM of a chelating agent such as EGTA, EDTA or sodium citrate can be administered to assist in eradication of the Salmonella after the anti-tumor effects have been achieved.

[0070] When administered to a patient, e.g., an animal for veterinary use or to a human for clinical use, the mutant Salmonella can be used alone or may be combined with any physiological carrier such as water, an aqueous solution, normal saline, or other physiologically acceptable excipient. In general, the dosage ranges from about 1.0 c.f.u./kg to about 1×10¹⁰ c.f.u./kg; optionally from about 1.0 c.f.u./kg to about 1×10⁸ c.f.u./kg; optionally from about 1×10² c.f.u./kg to about 1×10⁸ c.f.u./kg; optionally from about 1×10⁴ c.f.u./kg to about 1×10⁸ c.f.u./kg.

[0071] The mutant Salmonella of the present invention can be administered by a number of routes, including but not limited to: orally, topically, injection including, but limited to intravenously, intraperitoneally, subcutaneously, intramuscularly, intratumorally, i.e., direct injection into the tumor, etc.

[0072] The following series of examples are presented by ay of illustration and not by way of limitation on the scope of the invention.

7. EXAMPLE: LOSS OF VIRULENCE, REDUCED TNFα STIMULATION, AND INCREASED CHELATING AGENT SENSITIVITY, BY DISRUPTION OF THE SALMONELLA msbB 7.1. Isolation and Composition of Salmonella msbB Gene

[0073] A Salmonella genomic DNA library was first constructed. Wild type Salmonella typhimurium (ATCC strain 14028) were grown overnight and genomic DNA extracted according to the methods of Sambrook et al. (Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Ed., Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, 1989). Size-selected restriction endonuclease-digested fragments ranging from 2 to 10 kB were generated by time-limited digestion with Sau3A and selected by agarose gel electrophoresis. These fragments were ligated into pBluescript SK- and transformed to E. coli DH5a. Random analysis of clones revealed DNA inserts in ≧87%, with average size=5.1 Kb. The library consisted of 1.4×10⁴ independent clones. In order to reduce the hybridization of the E. coli-originated msbB probe, to the 100% homologous chromosomal gene in E. coli, the entire library was harvested from the petri dishes by flooding them with phosphate buffered saline and using a glass rod to dislodge the colonies, and the resulting bacterial population was subjected to a large-scale plasmid isolation, resulting in an amplified Salmonella library plasmid pool. This plasmid pool was then transformed to Salmonella LT2 YS5010, thereby eliminating the E. coli background.

[0074] A probe for msbB homologues was generated using a clone of the E. coli msbB gene (Karow and Georgopoulos 1992 J. Bacteriol. 174: 702-710) by digesting E. coli with BglII/HincII and isolating a 600 bp fragment which corresponds to a portion of the coding sequence. This fragment was labeled using α³²P-dCTP and used to probe the Salmonella library at low-stringency conditions consisting of 6×SSC, 0.1% SDS, 2×Denhardts, 0.5% non-fat dry milk overnight at 55° C. Strongly hybridizing colonies were purified, and plasmids extracted and subjected to restriction digestion and in situ gel hybridization under the same conditions used for colony hybridization (Ehtesham and Hasnain 1991 BioTechniques 11: 718-721). Further restriction digests revealed a 1.5 kB fragment of DNA which strongly hybridized with the probe and was sequenced at the Yale University Boyer Center using fluorescent dye termination thermal cycle sequencing. Sequence analysis revealed that the 1.5 kb fragment contained an msbB homologue which apparently lacked an initiating methionine corresponding to that of the E. coli gene. A probe consisting of the 5′ region of this clone was generated by performing restriction digests using EcoR1/XbaI and again hybridizing to the library. The complete nucleotide sequence of the Salmonella msbB gene (SEQ ID NO:1) and the deduced amino acid sequence of the encoded protein (SEQ ID NO:2) is shown in FIG. 1. The DNA homology of the putative Salmonella msbB and the E. coli msbB is 75%. The protein homology is 98%, confirming that the cloned Salmonella gene is a bona fide msbB.

7.2. Genetic Alteration of Salmonella msbB

[0075] A knockout construct was generated using the cloned Salmonella msbB gene. The cloned gene was cut with SphI and MluI, thereby-removing approximately half of the msbB coding sequence, and the tetracycline resistance gene from pBR322, cut with AatII and AvaI, was inserted after blunt-ending using the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I (FIG. 2A-2C). The knockout disruption was accomplished by homologous recombination procedures (Russell et al., 1989, J. Bacteriol. 171:2609); the construct was linearized using SacI and KpnI, gel purified and transfected to Salmonella LT2 YS501 by electroporation. Bacteria from the transformation protocol were first selected on tetracycline plates, and subsequently examined for the presence of plasmid-containing non-chromosomal integrated contaminants by ampicillin resistance and the presence of plasmids as determined by standard plasmid mini-preps (Titus, D. E., ed. Promega Protocols and Applications Guide, Promega Corp, 1991). Bacterial colonies which were tetracycline resistant yet lacked plasmids were subjected to a PCR-based analysis of the structure of their msbB gene. PCR was used with primers which generate a fragment inclusive of the region into which the tetracycline gene was inserted, where the forward primer was GTTGACTGGGAAGGTCTGGAG (SEQ ID NO:3), corresponding to bases 586 to 606, and the reverse primer was CTGACCGCGCTCTATCGCGG (SEQ ID NO:4), corresponding to bases 1465 to 1485. Wild type Salmonella msbB+ results in an approximately 900 base pair product, whereas the disrupted gene with the tetracycline insert results in an approximately 1850 base pair product. Several clones were obtained where only the larger PCR product was produced, indicating that the disruption in the msbB gene had occurred.

[0076] Southern blot analysis was used to confirm the disruption of the chromosomal copy of Salmonella msbB. The plasmid-based knockout construct (KO) was compared with genomic DNA prepared from wild type and putative disrupted msbB clones, YS82, YS86, YS8211 and YS861. The DNA was double digested with AseI/BamHI and separated by agarose gel electrophoresis on 0.9% or 1.2% agarose. Results of YS8211 and YS861 are presented in FIG. 3A-3C. Similar gels were subjected to three separate criteria: 3A) the presence of the tetracycline gene when probed with an ³²P-labeled tetracycline gene fragment, 3B) Restriction fragment length when probed with an ³²P-labeled AseI/BamHl fragment derived from the cloned msbB and 3C) the presence or absence of the msbB mluI fragment removed in order to disrupt the msbB gene and insert the tetracycline gene (FIG. 3A-3C). Since the mluI fragment was removed in order to disrupt the msbB gene and insert the tetracycline gene, it is expected that this probe would hybridize with the wild type FIG. 3C (lane 2 WT) but not the knockout construct (lane 1 KO), or the clones, (lanes 3 and 4 YS8211 and YS821) thereby confirming the genetic alteration of the msbB gene. Each of the clones examined exhibited all of the expected criteria for an msbB gene deletion (knockout). These data further confirm that msbB exists as a single copy in the wild type Salmonella, as no other hybridizing bands were observed when probed with a labeled oligonucleotide derived from the cloned DNA.

[0077] After the msbB mutation was confirmed, additional strains containing the msbB⁻ mutation were generated. The Salmonella strains used included WT 14028 and YS72 (pur⁻ xyl⁻ hyperinvasive mutant from WT 14028; Pawelek et al., WO 96/40238). P22 transduction was used to generate YS8211 (msbB::tet) using YS82 as a donor and YS861 and YS862 (msbB1::tet) using YS86 as a donor; all with WT 14028 as recipient. YS7216 (msbB1::tet from YS72) was generated by transduction using YS82 as a donor. Several derivatives are encompassed by the present invention, including but not limited to derivatives of YS8211 (YS8212, YS1170), YS862 (YS8644, YS8658), and YS7216 (YS1601, YS1604, YS1629). In a preferred embodiment, spontaneous derivatives grow somewhat faster on Luria agar compared to WT 14028 or msbB⁻ clones generated by transduction. msbB⁺ strains were grown in LB broth or on LB plates containing 1.5% agar at 37° C. msbB⁻ strains were grown in modified LB containing 10 g tryptone, 5 g yeast extract, 2 ml 1N CaCl₂ and 2 ml 1N MgSO₄ per liter, adjusted to pH 7 using 1N NaOH. For transducing msbB1::tet, LB lacking NaCl was used, with 4 mg/l tetracycline. Liquid cultures were shaken at 225 rpm. For tumor targeting experiments, cells were diluted 1:100 in LB, grown to OD₆₀₀=0.8 to 1.0, washed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), and resuspended in PBS.

7.3. Disruption of Salmonella msbB Reduces TNFα Induction 7.3.1. TNFα Induction in Mice

[0078] WT 14028 and the msbB⁻ clone YS8211, were first grown to saturation in LB media at 37° C. with shaking at 225 rpm. A 1:100 dilution of these bacterial strains were then transferred to fresh LB and grown to an OD₆₀₀=1.0 at 37° C. with shaking at 225 rpm. The bacteria were diluted in phosphate buffered saline and 1.0×10⁸ c.f.u. (about 5×10⁹ c.f.u./kg) were injected into the tail vein of Balb/C mice (n=4/strain), with PBS as a negative control. After 1.5 hours, serum was harvested in triplicate samples by cardiac puncture, centrifuged to remove the cellular content, and analyzed for TNFα using a Biosource International Cytoscreen ELISA plate, which was read on a Molecular Devices Emax microplate reader.

[0079] Results are presented in FIG. 4 and expressed as a percent of the level of TNFA induced by wild type Salmonella.

[0080] As demonstrated in FIG. 4, YS8211 induced TNFα significantly less than WT 14028. Thus, as shown in FIG. 4, the msbB⁻ strain induced TNFα about 33% (i.e., 3 times less) of the wild type msbB⁺ strain.

7.3.2. TNFα INDUCTION IN PIGS

[0081] An msbB⁻ strain of Salmonella, YS8212, and WT 14028, ere first grown to saturation in LB media at 37° C. with shaking at 225 rpm. A 1:100 dilution of these bacterial strains were then transferred to fresh LB and grown to an OD₆₀₀=0.8 at 37° C. with 225 rpm. The bacteria were washed in phosphate buffered saline and 1.0×10⁹ c.f.u. (about 1×10⁸ c.f.u./kg) were injected into the ear vein of Sinclair swine (n=6/strain). After 1.5 and 6.0 hours, serum was harvested, centrifuged to remove the cellular content, and frozen for later analysis. Analysis for TNFα utilized a Genzyme Predicta ELISA plate, which was read using a Gilson spectrophotometer.

[0082] Results are presented in FIG. 5 and are expressed as picograms of TNFα/ml serum.

[0083] As demonstrated in FIG. 5, at 90 minutes the level of TNFα induced by the msbB⁻ strain was significantly lower than that induced by the Salmonella WT 14028.

7.3.3. Salmonella LPS-Induced Respiration in Pigs

[0084] Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from Salmonella WT 14028 and the msbB⁻ clone, YS8212 was prepared using the procedure described by Galanos et al. (1969 Eur. J. Biochem. 9: 245-249). Briefly, LPS was extracted from bacteria which had been grown to OD₆₀₀ of 1.0. The bacteria were pelleted by centrifugation, washed twice with distilled water and frozen at −20C. LPS was purified by extraction with a mixture of 18.3 ml H20:15 ml phenol in a shaking water bath for 1 hr at 70 C. The mixture was cooled on ice, centrifuged at 20,000×g for 15 min, and the aqueous phase was removed. LPS was precipitated from the aqueous phase by addition of NaCl to 0.05 M and 2 volumes ethanol and incubation on ice, followed by centrifugation of 2000×g for 10 min. The precipitation was repeated after redissolving the pellet in 0.05 M NaCl, and the pellet lyophilized. The LPS was dissolved in sterile distilled water, and either 5 μg/kg or 500 μg/kg LPS was injected into the ear vein of Sinclair swine which had been anesthetized with Isoflurane. After 1.5 and 6.0 hours, respiration rate was determined and recorded.

[0085] Results are presented in FIG. 6 and are expressed as a percentage of respiration at time zero (t_(o)).

[0086] As demonstrated in FIG. 6, respiration was significantly higher in the pigs administered wild type LPS as compared to those administered the LPS from the msbB⁻ strain. Thus, disruption of the msbB gene in Salmonella, produces a modification in lipid A which results in reduced ability to increase respiration.

7.3.4. TNFα Induction in Human Monocytes

[0087] Human monocytes were prepared from peripheral blood by centrifugation through Isolymph (Pharmacia) and allowed to adhere to 24 well plates containing RPMI 1640. Salmonella WT 14028 and several of the msbB⁻ 14028 strains (YS8211, YS8212, YS8658, and YS1170) were first grown to saturation in LB media at 37° C. with shaking at 225 rpm. A 1:100 dilution of these bacterial strains was then transferred to fresh LB and grown to an OD₆₀₀=0.8 at 37° C. with 225 rpm. The bacteria were added to the cell culture wells and the culture medium was harvested after 2.0 hours, centrifuged to remove the cellular content, and analyzed for TNFα using a Genzyme Predicta ELISA plate, which was read using a Gilson spectrophotometer.

[0088] The data are presented in FIG. 7 and expressed as picograms of TNFα/ml serum.

[0089] As demonstrated in FIG. 7, the msbB⁻ strains induced TNFα significantly less than did the wild type strain.

7.3.5. msbB-Salmonella LPS TNFα Induction in Human Monocytes

[0090] Human monocytes were prepared from peripheral blood by centrifugation through Isolymph (Pharmacia) and allowed to adhere to 24 well plates containing RPMI 1640. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of wild type and of a number of msbB⁻ mutant Salmonella, (i.e., YS8211, YS8212, YS8658 and YS1170) was prepared using the procedure described by Galanos et al. (1969 Eur. J. Biochem. 9: 245-249) (see Section 7.3.3 for a brief description). The LPS was dissolved in sterile distilled water, and quantities ranging from 0.001 to 100 ng/ml LPS were added to the cell culture wells. After 15 hours the culture medium was harvested, centrifuged to remove the cellular content, and analyzed for TNFα using a Genzyme Predicta ELISA plate, which was read using a Gilson spectrophotometer.

[0091] The data are presented in FIG. 8 and are expressed as picograms of TNFα/ml serum.

[0092] As demonstrated in FIG. 8, LPS purified from the msbB⁻ strains induced TNFA significantly less than did the LPS from the wild type strain.

7.4. Disruption of Salmonella msbB Reduces Virulence 7.4.1. In Mice

[0093] A culture of wild type Salmonella 14028 and one of its msbB⁻ Salmonella clones, YS862, were grown in LB medium lacking sodium chloride at 37° C. with shaking at 250 rpm until the cultures reached an OD₆₀₀ of 0.8. The bacteria were diluted into phosphate buffered saline (PBS) at a ratio of 1:10 and the equivalent of 2×10⁷ C.f.u. were injected i.p. into C57BL/6 mice bearing B16F10 melanomas. Survival was determined daily, or at two to four day intervals.

[0094] Results are presented in FIG. 9A and are expressed as percent survival.

[0095] As shown in FIG. 9A, WT 14028 killed all the mice in 4 days, whereas the msbB⁻ mutant spared 90% of the mice past 20 days, demonstrating a significant reduction in virulence by the msbB⁻ mutant.

7.4.2. In Pigs

[0096] A culture of WT 14028 and one of its msbB⁻ Salmonella clones, YS8212, were grown in LB medium lacking sodium chloride at 37° C. with shaking of 250 RPM until the cultures reached an OD₆₀₀ of 0.8. The bacteria were washed in phosphate buffered saline and 1.0×10⁹ were injected into the ear vein of Sinclair swine (n=4/strain). Survival was determined daily, or at two to four day intervals.

[0097] Results are presented in FIG. 9B and are expressed as percent survival.

[0098] As shown in FIG. 9B, WT 14028 killed all the swine in 3 days, whereas the msbB- mutant spared 100% of the mice past 20 days, demonstrating a significant reduction in virulence.

7.5. Tumor Targeting 7.5.1. msbB Mutation

[0099] Salmonella WT 14028 with the msbB⁻ modification, were assayed to determine if they possessed tumor targeting ability using the B16F10 melanoma subcutaneous animal model. The msbB⁻ clone, YS8211, was grown in LB media lacking sodium chloride at 37° C. with shaking at 250 rpm to an OD₆₀₀ of 0.8. An aliquot of 2.0×10⁶ c.f.u. was injected i.v. into C57BL/6 mice which had been implanted with 2×10⁵ B16 melanoma cells 16 days prior to the bacterial infection. At two days and five days post bacterial infection, mice were sacrificed and tumors and livers assayed for the presence of the bacteria by homogenization and plating of serial dilutions.

[0100] Results are presented in FIG. 10 and are expressed as c.f.u. bacteria/g tissue. As demonstrated in FIG. 10, a positive ratio of tumor to liver (700:1) was found at 2 days, and increased to a positive ratio of 2000:1 at 5 days. Thus, the msbB⁻ mutant maintained the ability to target to a solid cancer tumor.

7.5.2. msbB Mutation in Combination with Auxotrophic Mutation

[0101] In order to assess compatibility with auxotrophic mutations, as measured by retention of the ability to target and replicate within tumors, combinations of the msbB mutation with auxotrophic mutations were generated. msbB⁺ strains were grown in LB broth or LB plates containing 1.5% agar at 370. msbB strains were grown in modified LB containing 10 g tryptone, 5 g yeast extract, 2 ml 1N CaCl₂ and 2 ml 1N MgSO₄ per liter, adjusted to pH 7 using 1N NaOH. For transducing msbB1::tet, LB lacking NaCl was used, with 4 mg/l tetracycline. Liquid cultures were shaken at 225 rpm. The msbB1::tet was transduced to auxotrophic strains to generate YS1604 (msbB⁻, pur⁻, hyperinvasive), YS7232 (msbB⁻, purI⁻, hyperinvasive), YS7244 (msbB⁻, purI⁻, AroA⁻ hyperinvasive), YS1482 (msbB⁻, purI⁻, purA⁻). For tumor targeting experiments, cells were diluted 1:100 into LB, grown to OD₆₀₀=0.8 to 1.0, washed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), resuspended in PBS, and 2×10⁶ were injected into the tail vein of C57BL/6 mice. At day 7, tumors were excised, weighed, homogenized, and c.f.u. determined by plating serial dilutions onto modified LB described above.

[0102] Results are presented in Table I and are expressed as c.f.u. per gram tumor tissue. Some of the strains, YS8211, YS1604, and YS7232 show high levels of c.f.u. within the tumors, whereas YS7244 and YS1482 are approximately 500 to 5000 times less. TABLE I Strain genetic marker c.f.u./gram tumor tissue YS8211 msbB⁻ 3 × 10⁹ YS1604 msbB⁻, pur⁻, hyperinvasive 9 × 10⁹ YS7232 msbB⁻, purI⁻, hyperinvasive 9 × 10⁹ YS7244 msbB⁻, purI⁻, AroA⁻ hyperinvasive 5 × 10⁵ YS1482 msbB⁻, purI⁻, purA⁻ 6 × 10⁶

7.6. Use of Salmonella with Disrupted msbB for Anti-Tumor Activity in Vivo

[0103]Salmonella typhimurium 14028 msbB⁻ clones YS8211, YS8212, YS7216, and YS1629 and WT 14028 (control) were grown in LB media lacking sodium chloride at 37° C. with shaking at 250 rpm to an OD₆₀₀ of 0.8. An aliquot of 2.0×10⁶ c.f.u. was injected i.p. into C57BL/6 mice which had been implanted with 2×10⁵ B16 melanoma cells 8 days prior to the bacterial infection. Tumor volume was monitored over time.

[0104] Results are presented in FIG. 11. Two of the strains, YS8211 and YS1629, showed significant tumor retardation, i.e., tumor growth inhibition.

7.7. Increased Sensitivity to Chelating Agents

[0105] In order to assess the sensitivity of bacterial strains to chelating agents, bacteria with or without the msbB mutation were grown in the presence or absence of 1 mm EDTA or 10 mM sodium citrate in Luria Broth (LB) lacking sodium chloride. An overnight culture of each of the bacterial strains was diluted 1 to 100 in fresh media, and grown at 37° C. with shaking at 250 rpm. The effect on growth was determined by spectrophotometric readings at an OD₆₀₀.

[0106] WT 14028 and msbB⁻ clone YS8211 were grown in the presence or absence of 1 mM EDTA (FIG. 12A). EDTA did not inhibit the growth of WT 14028. In contrast, the msbB⁻ clone showed near complete cessation of growth after 3 hours in the presence of EDTA.

[0107] WT 14028 and msbB⁻ clone YS862 were grown in the presence and absence of 10 mM sodium citrate (FIG. 12B). The msbB⁺ WT 14028 strain showed little inhibition by sodium citrate compared to the msbB⁻ strain which showed near complete cessation of growth after 3 hours in the presence of sodium citrate.

[0108] Thus, the msbB⁻ Salmonella mutants exhibited sensitivity to chelating agents which promote eradication of the bacteria, a characteristic which is similar to an antibiotic effect. It is envisioned that such a characteristic would be advantageous for use of msbB⁻ Salmonella mutants for in vivo therapy.

[0109] In order to further assess the sensitivity of Salmonella strains to chelating agents, the hyperinvasive pur strain YS72, its msbB⁻ strain, YS721, and a derivative of YS7216, YS1629, were grown in the presence of increasing concentrations of EDTA. The number of c.f.u. was determined after 4 hours. A fresh culture of YS72, its msbB⁻ strain YS7216 and its faster-growing derivative YS1629 were diluted 1 to 100 in fresh, zero salt LB media containing 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 or 2.0 mM EDTA and grown at 37° C. with 225 RPM for 4 hours, and c.f.u. was determined by plating serial dilutions onto LB plates (Table II). Greater than 99% inhibition was achieved for the msbB⁻ strain YS7216 at concentrations of EDTA greater than 0.25 mM and its derivative YS1629 was inhibited greater than 90% at 0.5 mM and greater than 99% at 2.0 mM. In contrast, although the YS72 clone exhibited some sensitivity to EDTA it was no inhibited at the 90% level even at 2.0 mM. TABLE II c.f.u. + EDTA {% inhibition} Strain c.f.u. no EDTA [0.25 mM] [0.5 mM] [1.0 mM] [2.0 mM] YS72 3.0 × 10⁹ 2.4 × 10⁹ 1.5 × 10⁹ 7.3 × 10⁸ 4.8 × 10⁸ {20%} {50%} {75%} {84%} YS7216 6.3 × 10⁸ 2.1 × 10⁶ 1.1 × 10⁶ 3.2 × 10⁶ 4.3 × 10⁶ {99.6%} {99.8%} {99.4%} {99.3%} YS1629 1.3 × 10⁹ 6.0 × 10⁸ 1.0 × 10⁸ 2.9 × 10⁷ 7.5 × 10⁶ {54%} {92%} {97%} {99.4%}

8. BACTERIAL SURVIVAL WITHIN MACROPHAGES

[0110] In order to determine the sensitivity of msbB⁻ Salmonella to macrophages, two types of macrophages were used: (A) bone marrow-derived macrophages obtained from the femurs and tibias of C57BL/6 mice, which were allowed to replicate by addition of supernatant from the LADMAC cell line which secretes macrophage colony stimulating factor (Sklar et al., 1985. J. Cell Physiol. 125:403-412) and (B) J774 cells (a murine macrophage cell line) obtained from America Type Culture Collection (ATCC). Salmonella strains used were WT 14028 and its msbB⁻ derivatives YS8211 and YS1170. Bacteria were grown to late log phase OD₆₀₀=0.8 and 1×10⁶ were allowed to infect a confluent layer of mammalian cells within a 24 well dish for 30 min, after which the extracellular bacteria were removed by washing with culture medium and the addition of 50 mg/ml gentamicin (Elsinghorst, 1994, Methods Enzymol. 236:405-420). Bacteria were counted by plating serial dilutions of the cell layer removed using 0.01% deoxycholate, and expressed as the percent initial c.f.u. over time.

[0111] The results are presented in FIG. 13 and expressed as percent c.f.u. per time. The msbB⁻ strain shows significantly less survival in macrophages.

9. LD50 OF msbB DERIVATIVES

[0112] Spontaneous derivatives of msbB⁻ strains YS8211 and YS7216 were selected from in vitro culture on non-modified LB medium based upon enhanced growth characteristics. These bacterial strains were grown to OD₆₀₀ of 0.8 and c.f.u. ranging from 1×10² to 1×10⁸ were injected i.v. into the tail vein of C57BL/6 mice. Acute lethality was determined at 3 days, and the LD₅₀ determined as described by Welkos and O'Brien (Methods in Enzymology 235:29-39, 1994). The results are presented in Table III. Thus, although all the msbB⁻ strains have a reduced ability to induce TNFA (See Section 7.3.5), the results demonstrate that strain YS1170 is significantly less attenuated than other msbB⁻ strains and therefore not all msbB⁻ strains are useful for providing both reduced TNFα induction and reduced virulence. TABLE III Strain LD₅₀ WT 14028 1 × 10³ YS8211 4 × 10⁶ YS8212 3.9 × 10⁷   YS1629 1 × 10⁷ YS1170 1 × 10⁶

10. DEPOSIT OF MICROORGANISMS

[0113] The following microorganisms were deposited with the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), 12301 Parklawn Drive, Rockville, Md. 20852 on ______ and have been assigned the indicated Accession numbers: Microorganism ATCC Accession No. YS8211      YS1629      YS1170     

[0114] The invention claimed and described herein is not to be limited in scope by the specific embodiments, including but not limited to the deposited microorganism embodiments, herein disclosed since these embodiments are intended as illustrations of several aspects of the invention. Indeed, various modifications of the invention in addition to those shown and described herein will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing description. Such modifications are also intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims.

[0115] A number of references are cited herein, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein, in their entirety, by reference.

1 4 2019 base pairs nucleic acid single linear DNA Coding Sequence 244...1210 1 GATCAACCAG CAAGCCGTTA ACCCTCTGAC AGCAAAATTG CCGCGCACGG AAGGTCTGAC 60 GGGGTCAGAT CGTCGTGAAT ACCTGGCACA GGTGAAAGAG GTTCTGCCGC AACTGCGCTT 120 CGATTAACAA ATGCGCTGAC AGAGCCGGTA CGCGATGTGT GCCGGCTTTT TTGTTTTGTG 180 TGAGACGCAG ACGTCGCTAC ACTATTCACA ATTCCTTTTC GCGTCAGCAG ACCCTGGAAA 240 AGC ATG GAA ACC AAA AAA AAT AAT AGT GAG TAT ATC CCT GAA TTC GAA 288 Met Glu Thr Lys Lys Asn Asn Ser Glu Tyr Ile Pro Glu Phe Glu 1 5 10 15 AAA TCC TTT CGC TAT CCA CAG TAT TGG GGC GCC TGG TTG GGC GCG GCG 336 Lys Ser Phe Arg Tyr Pro Gln Tyr Trp Gly Ala Trp Leu Gly Ala Ala 20 25 30 GCA ATG GCG GGG ATC GCA TTA ACA CCG GCA TCA TTC CGC GAC CCT TTG 384 Ala Met Ala Gly Ile Ala Leu Thr Pro Ala Ser Phe Arg Asp Pro Leu 35 40 45 CTG GCG ACG CTG GGG CGT TTT GCC GGA CGG CTG GGG AAG AGT TCT CGT 432 Leu Ala Thr Leu Gly Arg Phe Ala Gly Arg Leu Gly Lys Ser Ser Arg 50 55 60 CGC CGG GCG CTA ATT AAT CTG TCG TTG TGC TTT CCG CAG CGT AGC GAA 480 Arg Arg Ala Leu Ile Asn Leu Ser Leu Cys Phe Pro Gln Arg Ser Glu 65 70 75 GCT GAG CGC GAA GCG ATT GTC GAT GAG ATG TTC GCC ACC GCG CCA CAG 528 Ala Glu Arg Glu Ala Ile Val Asp Glu Met Phe Ala Thr Ala Pro Gln 80 85 90 95 GCA ATG GCG ATG ATG GCT GAG TTG GCG ATG CGC GGT CCG AAA AAA ATT 576 Ala Met Ala Met Met Ala Glu Leu Ala Met Arg Gly Pro Lys Lys Ile 100 105 110 CAA CAG CGT GTT GAC TGG GAA GGT CTG GAG ATT ATC GAG GAG ATG CGT 624 Gln Gln Arg Val Asp Trp Glu Gly Leu Glu Ile Ile Glu Glu Met Arg 115 120 125 CGT AAC GAC GAA AAA GTC ATT TTT CTC GTA CCG CAT GGC TGG GGC GTC 672 Arg Asn Asp Glu Lys Val Ile Phe Leu Val Pro His Gly Trp Gly Val 130 135 140 GAC ATT CCA GCC ATG CTG ATG GCC TCT CAG GGG CAA AAA ATG GCG GCG 720 Asp Ile Pro Ala Met Leu Met Ala Ser Gln Gly Gln Lys Met Ala Ala 145 150 155 ATG TTT CAT AAT CAG GGT AAT CCG GTT TTT GAC TAT ATC TGG AAC ACA 768 Met Phe His Asn Gln Gly Asn Pro Val Phe Asp Tyr Ile Trp Asn Thr 160 165 170 175 GTG CGT CGG CGT TTC GGC GGA CGT TTG CAT GCG CGT AAT GAC GGG ATT 816 Val Arg Arg Arg Phe Gly Gly Arg Leu His Ala Arg Asn Asp Gly Ile 180 185 190 AAA CCC TTT ATT CAG TCT GTT CGT CAG GGC TAC TGG GGT TAC TAC CTG 864 Lys Pro Phe Ile Gln Ser Val Arg Gln Gly Tyr Trp Gly Tyr Tyr Leu 195 200 205 CCG GAC CAG GAT CAC GGC CCG GAG CAT AGT GAA TTC GTT GAT TTC TTT 912 Pro Asp Gln Asp His Gly Pro Glu His Ser Glu Phe Val Asp Phe Phe 210 215 220 GCG ACA TAC AAA GCG ACG CTG CCT GCA ATT GGT CGG CTG ATG AAA GTG 960 Ala Thr Tyr Lys Ala Thr Leu Pro Ala Ile Gly Arg Leu Met Lys Val 225 230 235 TGC CGC GCA CGC GTG ATA CCG CTT TTC CCG GTG TAT AAT GGT AAA ACG 1008 Cys Arg Ala Arg Val Ile Pro Leu Phe Pro Val Tyr Asn Gly Lys Thr 240 245 250 255 CAT CGC CTG ACT ATC CAG ATT CGC CCG CCA ATG GAC GAT CTG CTC ACG 1056 His Arg Leu Thr Ile Gln Ile Arg Pro Pro Met Asp Asp Leu Leu Thr 260 265 270 GCT GAC GAC CAC ACT ATC GCC AGA CGG ATG AAC GAA GAG GTC GAA ATT 1104 Ala Asp Asp His Thr Ile Ala Arg Arg Met Asn Glu Glu Val Glu Ile 275 280 285 TTT GTC GGC CCG CAT CCG GAA CAG TAC ACC TGG ATC CTG AAG CTG CTC 1152 Phe Val Gly Pro His Pro Glu Gln Tyr Thr Trp Ile Leu Lys Leu Leu 290 295 300 AAA ACC CGC AAG CCA GGC GAG ATT CAG CCG TAT AAG CGT AAA GAT CTT 1200 Lys Thr Arg Lys Pro Gly Glu Ile Gln Pro Tyr Lys Arg Lys Asp Leu 305 310 315 TAT CCC ATC A AATAAATAAA GCCTCTCGTA AGAGAGGCTT TATGCTGACA AACCCTG 1257 Tyr Pro Ile Lys 320 TACTACCTGA TGAACAGGCG TGGGGGAGTT TTACTCAACG GTCAAAATAC GCGTGGTATT 1317 GGTTGAACCG ACGGTGCTCA TGACATCGCC CTGGGTCACG ATAACCAGGT CGCCGGAAAC 1377 CAGATACCCT TTATCGCGCA GCAGATTAAC AGCTTCATGT GCCGCGACAA CGCCATCAGC 1437 CGCGCTATCA AAATGCACCG GCGTTACTCC GCGATAGAGC GCGGTCAGGT TCAGCGTGCG 1497 TTCATGGCGC GACATGGCGA AAATCGGCAG GCCGGAGCTG ATACGGGAAG TCATTAGCGC 1557 GGTACGACCG GATTCCGTCA TGGTGATGAT CGCGGTAACG CCTTTCAGAT GGTTTGCCGC 1617 ATACACTGCA GACATGGCAA TGGCTTCTTC AACGTTGTCG AACTGCACGT CGAGACGGTG 1677 TTTAGACACA TTGATGCTGG GGATTTTTTC TGCGCCCAGG CACACGCGCG CCATTGCGGC 1737 AACGGTTTCA GAAGGATACT GACCGGCTGC GGTTTCGGCA GACAGCATAA CCGCATCCGT 1797 GCCATCCAGG ACGGCGTTCG CCACGTCCAT CACTTCCGCA CGGGTCGGCA TCGGGTTGGT 1857 GATCATCGAC TCCATCATTT GCGTTGCGGT GATGACTGCG CGGTTTAGCT GACGCGCACG 1917 GCGAATCAGC GCTTTCTGGA TACCAACCAG CTCCGGATCG CCGATTTCAA CGCCCAGATC 1977 GCCACGTGCG ACCATCACAA CGTCAGAGGC CAGAATGATA TC 2019 323 amino acids amino acid <Unknown> unknown protein 2 Met Glu Thr Lys Lys Asn Asn Ser Glu Tyr Ile Pro Glu Phe Glu Lys 1 5 10 15 Ser Phe Arg Tyr Pro Gln Tyr Trp Gly Ala Trp Leu Gly Ala Ala Ala 20 25 30 Met Ala Gly Ile Ala Leu Thr Pro Ala Ser Phe Arg Asp Pro Leu Leu 35 40 45 Ala Thr Leu Gly Arg Phe Ala Gly Arg Leu Gly Lys Ser Ser Arg Arg 50 55 60 Arg Ala Leu Ile Asn Leu Ser Leu Cys Phe Pro Gln Arg Ser Glu Ala 65 70 75 80 Glu Arg Glu Ala Ile Val Asp Glu Met Phe Ala Thr Ala Pro Gln Ala 85 90 95 Met Ala Met Met Ala Glu Leu Ala Met Arg Gly Pro Lys Lys Ile Gln 100 105 110 Gln Arg Val Asp Trp Glu Gly Leu Glu Ile Ile Glu Glu Met Arg Arg 115 120 125 Asn Asp Glu Lys Val Ile Phe Leu Val Pro His Gly Trp Gly Val Asp 130 135 140 Ile Pro Ala Met Leu Met Ala Ser Gln Gly Gln Lys Met Ala Ala Met 145 150 155 160 Phe His Asn Gln Gly Asn Pro Val Phe Asp Tyr Ile Trp Asn Thr Val 165 170 175 Arg Arg Arg Phe Gly Gly Arg Leu His Ala Arg Asn Asp Gly Ile Lys 180 185 190 Pro Phe Ile Gln Ser Val Arg Gln Gly Tyr Trp Gly Tyr Tyr Leu Pro 195 200 205 Asp Gln Asp His Gly Pro Glu His Ser Glu Phe Val Asp Phe Phe Ala 210 215 220 Thr Tyr Lys Ala Thr Leu Pro Ala Ile Gly Arg Leu Met Lys Val Cys 225 230 235 240 Arg Ala Arg Val Ile Pro Leu Phe Pro Val Tyr Asn Gly Lys Thr His 245 250 255 Arg Leu Thr Ile Gln Ile Arg Pro Pro Met Asp Asp Leu Leu Thr Ala 260 265 270 Asp Asp His Thr Ile Ala Arg Arg Met Asn Glu Glu Val Glu Ile Phe 275 280 285 Val Gly Pro His Pro Glu Gln Tyr Thr Trp Ile Leu Lys Leu Leu Lys 290 295 300 Thr Arg Lys Pro Gly Glu Ile Gln Pro Tyr Lys Arg Lys Asp Leu Tyr 305 310 315 320 Pro Ile Lys 21 base pairs nucleic acid single linear DNA 3 GTTGACTGGG AAGGTCTGGA G 21 20 base pairs nucleic acid single linear DNA 4 CTGACCGCGC TCTATCGCGG 20 

What is claimed is:
 1. A mutant Salmonella sp. comprising a genetically modified msbB gene in which the mutant Salmonella is capable of targeting a solid tumor when administered in vivo.
 2. The mutant Salmonella of claim 1 which is designated YS1629 and having ATCC Accession No. ______ or is designated YS1170 and having ATCC Accession No. ______ or is designated YS8211 and having ATCC Accession No. ______.
 3. The mutant Salmonella of claim 1 which is selected from the group consisting of Salmonella typhi, Salmonella choleraesuis, and Salmonella enteritidis.
 4. The mutant Salmonella of claim 1 which expresses an altered lipid A molecule.
 5. The mutant Salmonella of claim 1 which induces TNFα expression at about 5 percent to about 40 percent of that induced by a wild type Salmonella sp.
 6. The mutant Salmonella of claim 1 which induces TNFα expression at about 10 percent to about 35 percent of that induced by a wild type Salmonella sp.
 7. Lipopolysaccharide purified from the mutant Salmonella of claim 1 which induces TNFα expression at less than or equal to 0.001 percent of that induced by a wild type Salmonella sp.
 8. The mutant Salmonella of claim 1 in which a chelating agent inhibits growth by about 90 percent compared to the growth of a wild type Salmonella sp.
 9. The mutant Salmonella of claim 1 in which a chelating agent inhibits growth by about 99 percent compared to the growth of a wild type Salmonella sp.
 10. The mutant Salmonella of claim 1 in which a chelating agent inhibits growth greater than 99 percent compared to the growth of a wild type Salmonella sp.
 11. The mutant Salmonella of claim 8, 9, or 10 in which the chelating agent is selected from the group consisting of Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA), Ethylene Glycol-bis(β-aminoethyl Ether) N, N, N′, N′,-Tetraacetic Acid (EGTA) and sodium citrate.
 12. The mutant Salmonella of claim 1 which survives in macrophages at about 50 percent to about 30 percent of the level of survival of a wild type Salmonella sp.
 13. The mutant Salmonella of claim 1 which survives in macrophages at about 30 percent to about 10 percent of the level of survival of a wild type Salmonella sp.
 14. The mutant Salmonella of claim 1 which survives in macrophages at about 10 percent to about 1 percent of the level of survival of a wild type Salmonella sp.
 15. A method of inhibiting growth or reducing volume of a solid tumor cancer, comprising administering an effective amount of the mutant Salmonella sp. of claim 1 to a patient having a solid tumor cancer.
 16. The method according to claim 15 in which the utant Salmonella is selected from the group consisting of Salmonella typhi, Salmonella choleraesuis, and Salmonella enteritidis.
 17. The method according to claim 15 in which the mutant Salmonella expresses an altered lipid A molecule.
 18. The method according to claim 15 in which the mutant Salmonella induces TNFα expression at about 5 percent to about 40 percent of that induced by a wild-type Salmonella sp.
 19. The method according to claim 15 in which the mutant Salmonella induces TNFα expression at about 10 percent to about 35 percent of that induced by a wild-type Salmonella sp.
 20. The method according to claim 15 in which lipopolysaccharide purified from the mutant Salmonella induces TNFα expression at less than or equal to 0.001 percent of that induced by a wild type Salmonella sp.
 21. The method according to claim 15 in which a chelating agent inhibits growth of the mutant Salmonella by about 90 percent compared to the growth of a wild-type Salmonella sp.
 22. The method according to claim 15 in which a chelating agent inhibits growth of the mutant Salmonella by about 99 percent compared to the growth of a wild-type Salmonella sp.
 23. The method according to claim 15 in which a chelating agent inhibits growth of the mutant Salmonella by greater than 99 percent compared to the growth of a wild-type Salmonella sp.
 24. The method according to claim 21, 22 or 23 in which the chelating agent is selected from the group consisting of EDTA, EGTA and sodium citrate.
 25. The method according to claim 15 in which the mutant Salmonella survives in macrophages at about 50 percent to about 30 percent of the level of survival of a wild-type Salmonella sp.
 26. The method according to claim 15 in which the mutant Salmonella survives in macrophages at about 30 percent to about 10 percent of the level of survival of a wild-type Salmonella sp.
 27. The method according to claim 15 in which the mutant Salmonella survives in macrophages at about 10 percent to about 1 percent of the level of survival of a wild-type Salmonella sp.
 28. The method according to claim 15 in which the solid tumor cancer is melanoma.
 29. The method according to claim 15 in which the solid tumor cancer is colon carcinoma.
 30. The method according to claim 15 in which the solid tumor cancer is selected from the group consisting of lung cancer, liver cancer, kidney cancer, prostate cancer, and breast cancer.
 31. A pharmaceutical composition comprising an amount of the mutant Salmonella of claim 1 effective to inhibit growth or reduce volume of a solid tumor cancer; and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. 